Humanoid robots listed as shipping

It runs real ROS, but the hobby servos and Pi compute mean it is a teaching tool with a hard ceiling, not a path to research.

It is a delightful classroom toy with a chatbot bolted on, but the hobby servos and Python-only SDK are a dead end for real robotics research.

The $1,400 price only exists inside China; getting one to Europe means a gray-market import at four times the sticker and no warranty.

This is a 37 cm classroom teaching robot with no hands and about an hour of battery: it will delight students learning to code and do computer vision, but it will not fetch, carry, or do any real-world work.

The Air price does not buy the R1 hardware or EDU development access. Both consumer editions are closed to custom code; choose EDU for programming.

The backflips are real and the price is right, but this is an agility showpiece for classrooms and demos, not a manipulation or autonomy platform.

This is a research kit, not a robot: for roughly $6,000 you get servos, a printed chassis, and Python code, then you assemble it, print the body, add your own Jetson and battery, and train the policies yourself. It runs about 19 minutes before overheating hurts stability, tops out at 0.25 m/s, and the mechanical design is licensed non-commercial. Buy it to do ML research; do not buy it expecting anything to work on power-up.

This is the rare cheap humanoid with no SDK paywall: even the entry Geek tier is fully programmable, so you are not buying a locked demo box.

This is the R1 you can actually code, but the one-hour battery and configuration-dependent hardware mean extra equipment depends on the work you plan to do.

It is the friendliest humanoid to teach with, but its maker went bankrupt in 2025 and the brand now sits with a Chinese owner, so weigh long-term support before you commit a curriculum to it.

It is one of the most genuinely open platforms you can buy, but it is a Linux-and-terminal research bench, not something that does anything useful around a house.

Buy it for the open stack and the datasets behind it, not for hands or autonomy: out of the box it is a locomotion demo you develop on.

It walks beautifully out of the box, but the base G1 is a sealed demo unit: no hands, no code, no way to ever unlock it, so if you plan to develop, only the EDU counts.

Forget the famous $12k headline: that promo expired, EngineAI now lists it at about RMB 188,000 (~$26k), and even then you get open motion code and no hands, not a working worker.

The human-like walk is genuinely impressive, but with quote-only ordering and no set sticker, you are buying an R&D chassis, not a product with a fixed price.

The precision is real and the vendor is established, but the base price does not lock in the dexterous hands the demos show, and unstructured autonomy still has to be programmed.

The Pro's Thor compute is genuinely top-of-class, but the arms ship with a bare configurable end effector: budget roughly $11,000 for grippers or $17,000 for the dexterous-hand pair on top of the base.

Confirm the distributor is really authorized before you wire five figures abroad, and remember the hands and spare battery are extra on top of the sticker.

There is no product to unbox: this is a free design plus a parts list, so the real cost is the workshop, the sourcing, and the months of assembly it takes to get one walking.

This is a performer and greeter, not a worker: 3 kg per arm and a fist-shaped standard hand mean it dances and interacts rather than manipulates, and outside China and South Korea the only stock we can find is a Dutch reseller at EUR 75,999 excl. VAT, far above the China price (LimX's own rollout is a 2027 target).

You are buying a polished showroom host, not a general-purpose or developer robot: it walks slowly, lifts 1.5 kg, runs about 2 hours per charge, and has no public SDK. Its impressive moments (opening a car door, serving a drink) are a narrow demonstrated set, with VR teleoperation there for tasks beyond it.

It is a fully open developer platform with no SDK paywall, but the sticker is bare: budget several thousand more for the grippers or hands, because the arms ship empty.

This is the G1 you actually program, but the sticker is just the entrance fee: add a GPU workstation, hands, and a person who knows ROS2, or it sits in the crate.

You are buying a capable ROS 2 mobile-manipulation platform, not an autonomous worker: the grippers are standard (hands cost thousands more), and it does nothing useful until your engineers teleoperate it and train the skills yourself.

It is genuinely good at reception and guiding out of the box, but heavy manipulation is an integration project, and the impressive-looking Ultra hides its price.

The $29,900 headline is a bare China price on a locked demo unit: add import, duty, VAT, hands, and the EDU upgrade before it does anything but dance on a remote.

It is honest engineering, not an AI dream: it rolls rather than walks and carries about 2 kg per arm, but it actually does programmed tasks today at a Western-affordable price.

It is the H2 you can finally program, but doing real manipulation means paying separately for the Thor compute module and hands, and rigging a gantry for a 70 kg biped.

You are buying a development platform, not a worker. It walks and grips; anything task-shaped you build yourself, and the dexterous five-finger hands are a separate quote on top of a machine that already costs about 60,000 dollars.

You are buying an open, teleoperated research body with two simple grippers, not autonomous hands-and-brains: it grasps and manipulates beautifully when a person pilots it or your team codes it, but any independent behaviour is a project you build yourself.

The H1 is a legacy machine (superseded by the H2, though Unitree has posted no formal end-of-life notice): it is a locomotion research chassis with no hands and no autonomy, and the newer H2 does most of it for a third of the money on the platform Unitree is actually developing, so buy the H2 unless you have a specific reason to want the aging H1 lineage.

At a million euros it is a research instrument, not a robot that does anything on its own: you are buying the most open full-size chassis in Europe and a PhD team's worth of work.

It is a superb legs research platform, but out of the box it has no arms and no price tag: expect a quote and a build-up before it manipulates anything.

It is a proven open research canvas, but it is a blank one: expect a six-figure quote and to write every behavior yourself.

You are paying about $84,000 for a $29,900 H2 body with an NVIDIA Thor module and a reference-design badge, and the SharpaWave tactile hands that justify the whole thing add another $156,400. Read the DOF count carefully: the body is 31 DOF, not 75.